Comments on: Vanity URLs in Ruby on Rails Routes http://kconrails.com/2010/01/25/vanity-urls-for-ruby-on-rails-routes/         Adventures of Jaime Bellmyer, A Freelance Ruby on Rails Developer in Kansas City Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:01:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Jaime Bellmyer http://kconrails.com/2010/01/25/vanity-urls-for-ruby-on-rails-routes/#comment-59 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:29:14 +0000 http://kconrails.com/?p=228#comment-59 Huh, that’s not a bad idea. Between RESTful routes and named routes, is there ever a good reason not to explicitly name each route? Probably not. Plus if you’re *using* the default routes anywhere, you’re probably not doing the route testing you should.

Route testing is easy, and they run super-fast, so they should be a priority. I think I have the topic for my next article!

]]> By: Wes http://kconrails.com/2010/01/25/vanity-urls-for-ruby-on-rails-routes/#comment-58 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:45:07 +0000 http://kconrails.com/?p=228#comment-58 And naturally, you’d want to remove the default routes since you’re using RESTful routes, right?

]]>